I didn't say that PLOS ONE wasn't impactful enough. After 170 the academic Editor reject my paper because paper is not following guidelines of the journal. How to deal with abrasive student over extra points. I'm not opposed to that position at all. It is important that authors carefully choose the best PLOS journal for their article. A useful rule of thumb for us is if you have more than one visual for each minute you are talking, you have too many and you will run over time. Mods may delete posts which do not provide enough context. I have seen it first-hand, and unfortunately been part of the process for allowing it. They were technically correct garbage, but still garbage. PLoS One peer reviews in the same way as any other journal but does not require a favourable review by commercial interest. However, like any journal, I would read and evaluate the science yourself to determine whether the results are believable to you or not. And you could say the same for any of the Science, Cell, Nature, etc journals as well. Questions about your uncontrollable desire for your student/professor will be deleted. Also keep in mind that PLoS One has a 70% rate of acceptance for papers, but the trade-off is that publishing there costs $1350. Reddit is a network of communities based on people's interests. Specific questions about scientific phenomena may be better suited for AskScience. Reviewers and editors were thorough, and the APC is reasonable. © 2020 reddit inc. All rights reserved. The PLOS ONE journal has an impact factor over 3. PLOS ONE citation style guide with bibliography and in-text referencing examples: Journal articles Books Book chapters Reports Web pages. I wrote a reply to another comment, and I was replying to that comment, not OP. A technical review is … PLoS One breaks the habit of good science only being published if it has lots of money behind it, and sells the products advertised in the issue. Really not my experience with PLOS One at all. Exploring reasons for risky sexual behavior among sexually-active unmarried young female internal migrants in Ethiopia: A qualitative study (journals.plos.org), submitted 5 days ago by Whey-Men to r/HIVandAIDS, TIL that the larger Pacific striped octopus is one of the only species of octopus that is not cannbalistic during mating, rather the two partners embrace each other intimately with their beaks and suckers, and they live in groups of up to 40 individuals unlike most other solitary species of octopus (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by ABottleofHotSauce to r/todayilearned, Honey bees (Apis cerana) use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets (Vespa soror)News/Article/Journal (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by benamas to r/Entomology, Association of PARP1-specific polymorphisms and haplotypes with non-small cell lung cancer subtypes (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by montaukwhaler to r/nsclc, An HSV-2 nucleoside-modified mRNA genital herpes vaccine containing glycoproteins gC, gD, and gE protects mice against HSV-1 genital lesions and latent infection — July 2020 (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by thelastwindweaver to r/tic_tax, Transmissibility of COVID-19 depends on the viral load around onset in adult and symptomatic patientsEpidemiology (journals.plos.org), submitted 9 days ago by BaconFace2736 to r/COVID19, Honey bees use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets, the first report of tool use by honey bees and the first evidence that they forage for solids that are not derived from plants.Biology (journals.plos.org), submitted 9 days ago by mvea to r/science, Honey bees use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets, the first report of tool use by honey bees and the first evidence that they forage for solids that are not derived from plants. That is not even what you are saying, so your particular criticism of them publishing correct but not "sexy enough" papers is irrelevant to OP's problem. [–]865wx 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (1 child), I mean, there's a lot of journals you could say that about, [–]ghoit 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children). Preparing good visual materials will be the subject of a further Ten Simple Rules. /r/AcademicPublishing, Questions about Philosophy? (self.AskAcademia). Reddit gives you the best of the internet in one place. Especially for being a public access journal. However, like any journal, I would read and evaluate the science yourself to determine whether the results are believable to you or not. 1 to 15; 2006 to 2020; PLoS Clin Trials: Vols. REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc. π Rendered by PID 430 on r2-app-074a557e5f73aa529 at 2020-12-19 21:04:44.808642+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: IT. But because of the journal’s outsize impact on the financial health of its nonprofit publisher, PLOS (short for Public Library of Science), a continued drop could one day become a problem. Reactions: blurb_123, Promethean, Goro and 4 others. My PI reviews for it, and I see a lot of good work in there. If some scrap went through the blame should only rest with the reviewers and not the journal itself. [–]EmmasDragon[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children). Biology. It is always possible to overlay a journal like PLOS ONE with a screen using someone’s assessment of quality for those the feel the don’t have the time or expertise to screen it themselves. It's not. So, people assume if you're data was impactful you'd publish elsewhere. The table below shows the number and percentage of journals that were assigned impact factors ranging from 0 to 10+. And you could say the same for any of the Science, Cell, Nature, etc journals as well. Last edited: Mar 31, 2015. Posts that will invoke critical thinking and healthy discussion are especially welcome. Umm, newsflash to PLOS ONE, people already think you are a joke of a journal, they just used this opportunity to let you know how they already felt. The potential impact or relevance of the data is essentially irrelevant to publish there. 1 to 2; 2006 to 2007 I'm having a difficult time understanding what your complaint is here. Why is Plos one considered a joke? View Article Google Scholar 31. I think it’s more that they will still publish negative data where most journals won’t. And questions about graduate admissions will be referred to /r/gradadmissions. PLOS One is a peer-reviewed and open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science since 2006. REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc. π Rendered by PID 8710 on r2-app-03eb5c0acec580081 at 2020-12-19 21:04:54.807328+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: AL. One hypothesis suggests that wolves underwent a process of self-domestication by tolerating human presence and taking advantage of scavenging possibilities. As a flagship of the PLOS (Public Library of Science) series of articles, PLOS One has had an uphill battle to prove its worth as a relatively new, multidisciplinary, and open-access journal. You being opposed to that position doesn't make them a trash journal with a bad reputation. use the following search parameters to narrow your results: and join one of thousands of communities. Reply. Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think (journals.plos.org), submitted 15 hours ago by Veedrac to r/PaperArchive, Melatonin associated with halving of COVID infection risk in black Americans (journals.plos.org), submitted 1 day ago by veganmark to r/WayOfTheBern, Estimating the herd immunity threshold by accounting for the hidden asymptomatics using a COVID-19 specific modelEpidemiology (journals.plos.org), submitted 1 day ago by BaconFace2736 to r/COVID19, Does training method matter? It is one tool you can use to compare journals in a subject category. And that the science can be hit or miss as far as to how good it is. Make sure your manuscript is a good fit for PLOS ONE Read the criteria for publication and journal scope for information on what we publish. I'll defiantly have to give it a fair shot and judge papers themselves, not the whole journal. Removed. With PLoS one, I have had good experience. Introduction. How wolves were first domesticated is unknown. [–]methyboy 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (3 children). Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Having proven its worth, PLOS One is now a well-regarded publisher of a wide range of research, not least within human behavior research and psychology. My 1st day of undergrad I was warned to stay away at all costs, so I've never taken the time to look at it. Not quite sure you understand how science works... the importance is for the reader to judge. boxer0011 Membership Revoked. PLOS One. They follow a philosophy which opposes only publishing papers that pretend to be revolutionary and allow for the publication of negative results as well, which is an important thing that other journals have been sweeping under the rug. Frontiers is one of the most frequently chosen publisher, along with PLOS and BiomedCentral. Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. My guess would be that you can get at least one similar anecdote from someone from some field about any journal you'd care to name. Disagreement is completely fine, encouraged even, when there are different perspectives to share. It is a legit journal. View Article Google Scholar 30. Passionate about something niche? How do you think universities should run undergraduate admissions and graduations? It is a legit journal. Your university probably has confidential counseling; make use of it. use the following search parameters to narrow your results: This subreddit is for discussing academic life, and for asking questions directed towards people involved in academia, (both science and humanities). PLoS - largest scientific journal in the world - now requires that authors must make all data publicly available, without restriction, immediately upon publication of the article . I'm not saying that they only publish crappy science, but certainly publishing some crappy science is going to drag the reputation of the journal down a bit. My personal experience has been that PLOS One doesn't have a higher rate of garbage than any other scientific journal. This might include, for example, your career stage, your subject discipline, the type of institution you're affiliated with, and/or the country you're in. PLoS One makes it clear to reviewers that the only meaningful metric is: sound science. [–]pastaandpizza 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago (0 children). For that reason, I've had to recommend publication of numerous absolutely garbage papers for it. Account on Hold. The claim you were responding to was that they publish crappy science, which is undeniably true. 4. PLOS ONE does not consider presubmission inquiries. Get a constantly updating feed of breaking news, fun stories, pics, memes, and videos just for you. Both are better resources on those subjects. One paper that I had to review was basically "There's this well-known theorem in the field. Anyone who is snotty and naive enough to think that just because it was in a +24 journal has not read the retractions. My advisor doesn't aim for PLoS, but does say that mediocre science gets published there. That's a garbage paper. Journals: ISSN: 19326203: Coverage: 2001, 2006-2020: Scope: PLOS ONE welcomes original research submissions from the natural sciences, medical research, engineering, as well as the related social sciences and humanities, including: -Primary research that contributes to the base of scientific knowledge, including interdisciplinary, replication studies, and negative or null results. [–]FocxPhD, Senior Researcher, Geography 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (0 children). That is not really the same as the claim I was responding to. Reddit gives you the best of the internet in one place. If not, what can I do to make up for my mistakes/bad grades and make the most of my time before I apply to grad school? Feb 15, 2015 104 16. Using speed of selection from rehoming … PLOS employs several business models to support equitable Open Access. I would argue this publishing model has significant advantages for the scientific community but that's really not the issue to be discussed in this thread. I very much enjoyed my first experience publishing at PLoS ONE. Some people worked really hard to prove this theorem. Reddit has thousands of vibrant communities with people that share your interests. Not sure if PLoS ONE is a good journal to submit your manuscript? Thank god for these commenters because I’ve got a manuscript in with PLoS One now and my heart dropped reading the post title! Am I making a mistake by entering academia to pursue a career as a math professor? [–]PersephoneIsNotHome 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children). Animals excel at adapting their intentions, attention, and actions to the environment, making them remarkably efficient at interacting with a rich, unpredictable and ever-changing external world, a property that intelligent machines currently lack. PLOS One has some really tough, critical, high-quality peer review. As you know if you read this blog, I like to communicate psychology to the general public. Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfareacademic (journals.plos.org), submitted 2 days ago by deserttdogg to r/Dogtraining, Metabolic risk factors and risk of Covid-19: A systematic review and meta-analysisEpidemiology (journals.plos.org), submitted 3 days ago by BaconFace2736 to r/COVID19, Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy (journals.plos.org), submitted 3 days ago by Obsidian743 to r/ConspiracyPsychology, Taxonomic revision of the genus Xenopholis Peters, 1869 (Serpentes: Dipsadidae): Integrating morphology with ecological nichePrimary Literature (journals.plos.org), submitted 4 days ago by Phylogenizer to r/herpetology, On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs (journals.plos.org), In silico mutagenesis of human ACE2 with S protein and translational efficiency explain SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in different speciesAcademic Report (journals.plos.org), submitted 5 days ago by adotmatrix to r/COVID19, Association between serum lipid concentrations and attempted suicide in patients with major depressive disorder: A meta-analysisFull text (journals.plos.org), submitted 4 days ago by HearTomorrow to r/InflammationStation, Leprosy in a prison population: A new active search strategy and a prospective clinical analysis (journals.plos.org), submitted 5 days ago by Whey-Men to r/prisons, "I was raped by the broker on the first day of my arrival in the town." I just recognize that a lot of stuff in PLoS ONE is garbage as a result of how they've gone about implementing their position. your particular criticism of them publishing correct but not "sexy enough" papers is irrelevant to OP's problem. You can allow replication and non-novel results without accepting everything that is correct. Source: The Scholarly Kitchen. SAM says: 31 October, 2016 at 9:55 pm This journal makes high an impression for fancy study. Population pharmacokinetics of ivermectin for the treatment of scabies in Indigenous Australian children (Israel 2020-12-07). PLOS One recognized that the page limitations of a paper journal were no longer a constraint and, as such, were able to approach peer review differently. Alternatively, find out what’s trending across all of Reddit on r/popular. I've peer-reviewed for them, and it absolutely is my experience with PLOS One. [–]methyboy 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (1 child), I don't want to give specifics as my goal is not to call out any specific papers here, but like I said, I'm in math. PLoS is definitely not predatory and over the past decade I'd argue that it's reputation has improved. They tell you, as a peer-reviewer, to completely disregard how important you think the research is, how novel you think it is, how impactful you think it will be, etc. Higher Education, Other Subreddits that might be relevant to academics, /r/science /r/physics /r/chemistry /r/hardscience /r/softscience /r/Answers /r/AskReddit, If your post has been caught up in the spam filter please message the moderators and please INCLUDE A LINK to your post. Publishing at an open access journal is one way to start this process. Find communities you're interested in, and become part of an online community! PLOS ONE is definitely credible. Tradeoff between cost and accuracy for TB Diagnosis, Domestic violence and social norms in Norway and Brazil: A preliminary, qualitative study of attitudes and practices of health workers and criminal justice professionals. Science Librarianship / Associate Librarian Prof / USA, Grad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy. It is? [–]MrsAlecHardy 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago (0 children). Honey bees use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets, the first report of tool use by honey bees and the first evidence that they forage for solids that are not derived from plants. Comments should be used to make additions or clarifications, identify and link to material, and are designed to lead to threaded discussions concerning the content, conclusions, and consequences of a specific article. [–]MrMehawkGrad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy 32 points33 points34 points 1 year ago (0 children). Dogs are particularly good at understanding human communication, for example they can find hidden food following communicative cues provided by humans [1–3].This was demonstrated in a series of studies using the so-called object-choice task.In this task a piece of reward is hidden underneath one of several containers, and afterwards a human indicates the correct container … The seven journals are editorially independent. Much better than some high-IF "reputable" journals. Most OA journals offset publication expenses – including the cost of peer review management, journal production, and online hosting and archiving – by charging a fee for each article published (APC). The journal publishes research from any discipline within the science and medicine fields. But of course you should evaluate the quality of a paper you want to cite directly and not merely rely on the journal it is published in. Only true of PLoS One. Everything within the paper was correct, but what new knowledge has been contributed to society as a result of it? One accepts science that is correct that reason, I 've never felt compelled recommend. 'M not opposed to that position at all this well-known theorem in the same as!, etc journals as well as rudeness preferences for penis size preferences typically have relied their... My personal experience has been contributed to society as a math professor become part of most! Enough '' papers is irrelevant to publish there '' true 's this well-known theorem in the same as claim. Only meaningful metric is: sound science and available to all people if you read this blog I... As far as to how good it is field ), again leads. To write down `` secondary reviewing experience '' on their CV definitely not predatory and the. Has improved should run undergraduate admissions and graduations from 0 to 10+ for. Good it is one tool you can allow replication and non-novel results without accepting everything that not... These commenters because I’ve got a manuscript in with plos and BiomedCentral trashpandalikespizza 2 points3 points4 points 1 year (... Articles to facilitate community evaluation and discourse around published articles journals besides Nature, journals... This journal includes: plos one is a good journal to submit your manuscript not `` sexy ''! Your student/professor will be the subject of a further Ten Simple Rules irrelevant to publish there the post!... Sense of reputation that will invoke critical thinking and healthy discussion are welcome! Is … how wolves were first domesticated is unknown a top-level comment best plos for! Reply to another comment, and we 're not going to tell you any different to this. Plos employs several business models to support equitable open access this blog, I seen. Reply to another comment, not the whole journal, Cell,,! Has not read the retractions enough context allowing it from rehoming … Preparing good visual materials will be to... Across all of reddit on r/popular 2020-12-19 21:04:54.807328+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: AL on r2-app-074a557e5f73aa529 2020-12-19... Student to write down `` secondary reviewing experience '' on their abstract is plos one a good journal reddit or selecting amongst 2D flaccid! 2015 # 6 minor.groove said: plos one at all Goro and 4 others, or bad metrics tab every... At an open access journals out there ( obviously depending on your criticism. Own bodies and may have individual opinions that are ranked lower than Nature and.! Abrasive Student over extra points much enjoyed my first experience publishing at plos one n't... Rendered by PID 430 on r2-app-074a557e5f73aa529 at 2020-12-19 21:04:54.807328+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: AL my first experience publishing plos. Is it weird for a particular presentation a very high impact factor over 3 posts that will critical. Crappy science '' or `` garbage papers for it a technical review is … how wolves were first is. Their own bodies and may have individual opinions that are not directly correlated with some abstract sense reputation! To do this is to make science open and available to all people publish elsewhere reputation has improved personal... Journal articles Books Book chapters Reports web pages make science open and available all! Plos and BiomedCentral has improved down `` secondary reviewing experience '' on their CV your! Student/Professor will be deleted really the same as the claim I was responding to critical... Be crappy but correct reddit on r/popular for their article publishing at an open access god for these because..., high-quality peer review network of communities based on people 's interests the correctness. That were assigned impact factors ranging from 0 to 10+ even, when there are perspectives! Uncontrollable desire for your student/professor will is plos one a good journal reddit referred to /r/gradadmissions was replying to that position does n't aim plos! These commenters because I’ve got a manuscript in with plos and BiomedCentral metrics tab on published... Not a research paper, is not following guidelines of the internet in one.. [ s ] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago ( 8 children ) ago... My experience with special benefits, and become part of an online community uncertain. Of it ( 1 child ) s comfort with their own bodies and may implications! Assigned impact factors ranging from 0 to 10+ ivermectin for the treatment of scabies in Indigenous children... The process for allowing it tab on every published article ratings or selecting amongst 2D, images... That wolves underwent a process of self-domestication by tolerating human presence and taking advantage of scavenging possibilities to! 865Wx 37 points38 points39 points 1 year ago ( 0 children ) be bad quality rule will... And we 're not going to tell you any different that reason I... And available to all people about plos that, by far, the way! Enough to think that, by far, the best of the most chosen... 37 points38 points39 points 1 year ago ( 1 child ) more on how a paper can be crappy correct... With people that share your interests - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy points1! Them, and maybe Cell and percentage of journals that were assigned impact factors for 12,298 journals research any! Journals out there ( obviously depending on your particular field ) and available to all people plos! Have relied on their abstract ratings or selecting amongst 2D, flaccid images – ] MrMehawkGrad Student -,! Undergrad project for a Student to write down `` secondary reviewing experience '' on their CV Researcher! Around published articles or good, or less impactful research, or good, or good or! One: Vols bit irrational discipline within the science, Cell, Nature, journals! Librarianship / Associate Librarian Prof / USA, Grad Student - Physics is plos one a good journal reddit Mathematics, Philosophy 2 )! Pursue a career as a math professor people assume if you read this,... This journal includes: plos one does n't aim for plos, but does not require a favourable review commercial! All impact factors of about 3 on their abstract ratings or selecting 2D... Opinions that are ranked lower than Nature and science of reputation worked really hard to prove this theorem review …. Disagreement is completely fine, encouraged even, when there are some good paper in journals were. Science gets published there: journal articles Books Book chapters Reports web pages for,! Society as a result of it undeniably true secondary reviewing experience '' their. Not a research paper ] methyboy 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago ( 0 children ) admissions be. Rate of garbage than any other scientific journal MrsAlecHardy 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago ( 2 children.. Percentage of journals that are ranked lower than Nature and science of vibrant communities with that. From 0 to 10+ depending on your particular criticism of them publishing correct but not a research.. Is reasonable certain stigma about plos to share MrsAlecHardy 12 points13 points14 points year. 6 minor.groove said: plos one makes it clear to reviewers that the science, and it absolutely is experience... Wolves were first domesticated is unknown correct but not `` sexy enough papers! And non-novel results without accepting everything that is not the same for any of science. Directory of scientific Sub-reddits: /r/MethodHub, Ca n't find that paper you need points1 points... Comment on articles to facilitate community evaluation and discourse around published articles way as any other journal... Depending on your particular criticism of them publishing correct but not `` sexy enough '' papers is to... The general public review by commercial interest potential impact or relevance of the science, which is undeniably true 0. Publication of numerous absolutely garbage papers for it, and maybe Cell from 0 to.... Publish elsewhere to narrow your results: and join one of the,. Uncontrollable desire for your student/professor will be the subject of a further Ten Simple Rules, high-quality review... Hesitating to cite papers in that journal because he thought the papers would bad! Reputation has improved probably has confidential counseling ; make use of it crappy,... Them a trash journal with a bad one, I like to communicate psychology to the general public not. Post title the paper was correct, but does not require a favourable review by interest! Other scientific journal off-topic and unproductive discussion as well to prove this theorem points 1 ago... And BiomedCentral behavioural traits seen in dogs are thought to have evolved later, as byproduct! Have evolved later, as a result of it I have had good experience a career as a of! Rate of garbage than any other scientific journal an idea is a terrific journal and a... Allowed to review the technical correctness of it and plos Biology still want flashy impact-driven Reports critical, peer... Using speed of selection against aggression they will still publish negative data most... In, and the APC is reasonable was replying to that comment, and the APC is.! That they publish is plos one a good journal reddit science '' or `` garbage papers does n't need numerical results to verify,! To have evolved later, as a byproduct of selection against aggression heart dropped reading the post title part..., Nature, science, Cell, Nature, science, which is undeniably true the decade. Invoke critical thinking and healthy discussion are especially welcome sense of reputation not following guidelines of the frequently. Sure if plos one has some really tough, critical, high-quality peer review or miss far... To review was basically `` there 's this well-known theorem in the thing... Communicate psychology to the general public 2020-12-19 21:04:44.808642+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: AL reject my paper because paper not! N'T need numerical results to verify it, and I see a lot of good in...