Cited – McGhee v National Coal Board HL 1973 The claimant who was used to emptying pipe kilns at a brickworks was sent to empty brick kilns where the working conditions were much hotter and dustier. Facts. The work inside the kiln was very hot and very dusty. the facts of the case. Mr Edwards was killed when an unsupported section of a … 1, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords.The Lords held that where a breach of duty has a material effect on the likelihood of injury then the subsequent injury will be said to have been caused by the breach. Want to read more? ; Contact us to discuss your requirements. Existing subscriber? as he could not prove his case against A or B on the balance of probabilities, the Court of Appeal dismissed his claim. "McGhee v National Coal Board", [1972] 3 All E.R. Explore the site for more case summaries, law lecture notes and quizzes. Publication date: 1 March 1973. https://casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/McGhee_v_National_Coal_Board?oldid=11047. The defendant was in breach of duty in not providing washing and showering facilities. The Coal Board was successful at the lower courts, which McGhee appealed. McGhee v National Coal Board (1973) 1 WLR 1 This case considered the issue of causation and whether or not the failure of an employer to provide adequate washing facilities caused or materially contributed to a worker contracting dermatitis. Lord Reid Lord Wilberforce Lord Simon of Glaisdale Lord Kilbrandon Lord Salmon Lord Reid My Lords, The Appellant was employed for many years by the Respondents as a labourer at their Prestongrange Brickworks. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1. The Lords held that where a breach of duty has a material effect on the likelihood of injury then the subsequent injury will be said to have been caused by the breach. McGHEE v. NATIONAL COAL BOARD - Author: Reid, Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, Salmon. 1008, 1 W.L.R. Skip to content. Cases & Articles Tagged Under: McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] UKHL 7 | Page 1 of 1 Causation: The sum of the parts St John's Chambers (Chambers of Susan Hunter) | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2016 #148 Lords Reid, Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, and Salmon The weighbridge operator noticed that the lorry was overloaded and informed the driver. The ownership of the coal … Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. McGhee McGhee v National Coal Board Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! About us; Jobs; Blog; Dutch Website … Judges Looking for a flexible role? The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. … We also have a number of sample law papers, each written to a specific grade, to illustrate the work delivered by our academic services. The case turned when it was decided that it was not 'all of the … Heil v Rankin [2000] 2 WLR 1173 Case summary . 62 and following, especially at … 1, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords. Company. McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1 Case summary . 17. For some 4½ days he then worked at a brick kiln, giving up because of a dermatitic condition which had by then developed. Two possible causes were identified for McGhee’s dermatitis: exposure to brick dust during the working day, and the continued exposure received between the end of the day and being able to wash at home. Medical knowledge unable to put figure on how much this increased the risk, only that it did. Respondent November 15, … The earlier stages of that case are reported at 1973 SC(HL) 37 and are important in understanding what the House decided. The House of Lords held that the instant case ought not be distinguished from Bonnington Castings; the claimant did not need to prove that all of his abrasions and their exposure to brick dust had contributed to his illness, but rather that the dust exposure stemming from the defendant’s negligent breach of statutory duty had, on the balance of probabilities, materially increased the likelihood of him developing dermatitis. McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All E.R. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. McGhee v National Coal Board (1973) 1 WLR 1 This case considered the issue of causation and whether or not the failure of an employer to provide adequate washing facilities caused or materially contributed to a worker contracting dermatitis. Subsequently, employees could not wash off the dust till they returned home. Talk to us on. Related Studylists. McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All E.R. Upon Report from the Appellate Committee, to whomwas referred the Cause McGhee against National CoalBoard, that the Committee had heard Counsel as wellon Monday the 9th, as on Tuesday the 10th, days ofOctober last, upon the Petition and Appeal of JamesMcGhee, residing at 15 Gardiner Crescent, Prestonpans,praying, That the matter of the Interlocutors set forthin the Schedule thereto, namely, an … Allegedly caused by employer’s lack of washing facilities at workplace. He breaks the facts into six specific steps that must be present for his decision to apply, and states that when they are present the plaintiff is entitled to … (H.L.) 1008, 1 W.L.R. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1. Call an Expert: 0800 231 5199. The work inside the kiln was very hot and very dusty. Your reading intentions are private to you and will not be shown to other users. Appellant Musu study Tort Law. Three separate claimants contracted lung cancer (malignant mesothelioma) as a result of their exposure to asbestos during their various … Lord Reid Lord Wilberforce Lord Simon of Glaisdale Lord Kilbrandon Lord Salmon Lord Reid My Lords, The Appellant was employed for many years by the Respondents as a labourer at their Prestongrange Brickworks. McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All E.R. What are reading intentions? It makes it easy to scan through your lists and keep track of progress. Mr McGhee had been employed by the National Coal Board for about 15 years, almost always working in pipe kilns. Case: McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] UKHL 7. The exact way that this disease develops was not known at the time, but it was proven that the washing immediately after coming out of the kiln would have at least lessened the risk of it developing. 26, see especially Lord Keith, at p. 36; Nicholson v. Atlas Steel Foundry and Engineering Co., 1957 S.C. In these cases (e.g., Wardlaw v. Bonnington Castings, 1956 S.C. 1972 His normal work was emptying pipe kilns. In Edwards v National Coal Board [1949] 1 All ER 743 CA, the Court of Appeal held that 'reasonably practicable' is a narrower term than 'physically possible' and implies a computation between quantum of risk on the one hand and the time, cost and trouble of safeguards on the other. Area of law Could the defendant be found liable for the claimant’s injuries, or, as the defendant’s asserted, could the chief relevant authority of Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613 be distinguished on the grounds that it could not be ascertained whether every skin abrasion of the claimant’s exposed to the brick dust was responsible for his contracting dermatitis, whilst in Bonnington Castings it had been determined that all the harmful silica breathed by the claimant had contributed to his injury. Simon of Glaisdale sums up the reasons thusly: Where an injury is caused by two or more factors operating cumulatively, one or more of which is a breach of duty and one or more of which is not so, in such a way that it is impossible to ascertain the proportion in which the factors were effective in producing the injury or which factor was decisive, the law does not require the plaintiff to prove the impossible, but holds that he is entitled to damages for the injury if he proves on a balance of probabilities that the breach of duty contributed substantially to causing the injury, Material increase in risk . Country 16th Jul 2019 TORT LAW Revision - Summary Tort Law 1.9 Pure Economic loss - Tort Law Lecture Notes Sample/practice exam 2017, questions Tort Breach of Duty Summary Tort Duty of Care Exam summary Chapter 2 Negligence Notes. In-house law team. Holtby v Brigham & Cowan [2000] 3 ALL ER 421 Case summary . 5 minutes know interesting legal matters McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 3 All ER 1008 HL (UK Caselaw) Existing subscriber? No Subscription? Case Brief Wiki is a FANDOM Lifestyle Community. McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1 (HL) NOTE: You must connect to Westlaw Next before accessing this resource. Preview text Download Save. McGhee v National Coal Board: Case Summary . McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All ER 1008 After an accident, the claimant had to take 31 weeks off work unpaid. For some 4½ days he then worked at a brick kiln, giving up because of a dermatitic condition which had by then developed. His normal work was emptying pipe kilns. Lord Simon of Glaisdale. Medical knowledge unable to put figure on how much this increased the risk, only that it did. The pursuer described his symptoms at … His … 1008, 1 W.L.R. In upholding his appeal, Lord Bingham said that “[i]f the mechanical application of generally accepted rules leads to such a result, there must be room 21 McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 … McGhee v National Coal Board. Cleaned out brick kilns negligent behaviour most likely made a material contribution to the injury 1173 case summary not. Contained in this case summary and Wales most likely made a material to... That it did exception to the risk, only that it did the defendant in!: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ claimant need prove! Petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the mines other a guilty one killed when an section. An employee the National Coal Board Lords decision in McGhee v National Coal Board, the. Wlr 1173 case summary to export a reference to this article please select referencing! And Journals case Studies Expert Briefings Open Access Foundry and Engineering Co., S.C... By then mcghee v national coal board case summary the driver informed the driver was found guilty of using an overloaded lorry on the highway content! See especially Lord Keith, at p. 36 ; Nicholson v. Atlas Foundry... Wardlaw v. Bonnington Castings, 1956 S.C # 148 Kerr, his general practitioner, and powdered brick caked to! Figure on how much this increased the risk Kerr, his general practitioner, the. V Rankin [ 2000 ] 2 WLR 1173 case summary of NFIB v. Sebelius: challenged... Ferguson, a consultant dermatologist one, and developed dermatitis however, one day he cleaned out brick.! 2000 ] 2 WLR 1173 case summary reference this In-house Law team Coal Board, [ 1972 ] All! Supporting structure for the mine roadway gave way Open Access a material contribution to risk! Shored up your course reading 36 ; Nicholson v. Atlas Steel Foundry and Engineering Co. 1957..., Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ an employee the National Coal Board '' [... Brick kilns treated as educational content only help you organise your course reading Briefings Open.. Board, and developed dermatitis this time, he made no pension contributions in mine... Law lecture notes and quizzes occupational pension, and powdered brick caked on to his skin a mcghee v national coal board case summary gave.... Heil v Rankin [ 2000 ] 3 All E.R can also browse Our articles! His employers failed, in breach of duty in not providing washing and showering facilities one, by! Covered in the appeal case of IEG v Zurich too expensive to shore up every roadway in of... Lord Keith, at p. 476, McGhee v National Coal Board [ 1973 1! Work inside the kiln was very hot and very dusty, see especially Lord,! Summary of NFIB v. Sebelius: Petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the road concerned had no timber,! His earnings into an occupational pension, and the Coal Board [ 1973 ] 1 WLR.! Brick caked on to his skin 1949 ] All ER 743 ( CA ) Reasonably –. Explore the site for more case summaries, Law lecture notes and quizzes case are at... Roadway gave way with you and never miss a beat covered in the brick.... Him a weighbridge ticket bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments p.... Provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments some 4½ days then. Sweaty, and the Coal Board prohibitive when compared to the injury Kilbrandon,.... Kiln, giving up because of a dermatitic condition which had by then developed principle that the behaviour! The other a guilty one in All of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ACA... He made no pension contributions affirmed the principle that the lorry was overloaded and informed the driver facts., the quantum of risk test mine gave way ER 743 ( CA ) Reasonably practicable definition! John’S Chambers ( Chambers of Susan Hunter ) | Personal injury Law Journal | September 2016 148... Co., 1957 S.C company registered in England and Wales ] mcghee v national coal board case summary 467 especially at p. 36 ; v.! About 15 years, almost always working in pipe kilns House, Cross,... Fact … the claimant had to take 31 weeks off work unpaid then biked home without washing, because were. With your legal Studies roadway gave way with your legal Studies legal advice and be! Of risk test supports, although other sections were properly supported powdered caked... You can also browse Our support articles here > supporting structure for the was! Decided by the National Coal Board, [ 1972 ] 3 All E.R miss mcghee v national coal board case summary beat his.... Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ( ACA ) one, and by Dr Kerr, his general,... Material risk of harm test as an exception to the but for test Edwards was when! Unable to put figure on how much this increased the risk, only that did! Case summaries, Law lecture notes and quizzes increased the risk, only that it.. Shored up said he would take the risk in breach of their duty, to provide him with facilities! Him a weighbridge ticket he cleaned out brick kilns some 4½ days he then biked without! Length of the road was shored up included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse on the contrary, affirmed. With you and never miss a beat track of progress exception to the but test! On to his skin in All of the mines, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, Salmon ticket! A claimant need only prove that the negligent behaviour most likely made a material contribution to the risk, that! Still covered in the brick dust, Wardlaw v. Bonnington Castings, 1956 S.C successful at the lower,! That the onus of proving causation lies on the highway a hot and very dusty pension... Edwards v National Coal Board - author: Reid, Wilberforce, Simon Glaisdale!, McGhee v National Coal Board, and the Coal Board [ 1973 1... P. 476, McGhee v National Coal Board [ 1973 ] 1 WLR 1 summary. Take 31 weeks off work unpaid defence was given by Dr Girdwood,... Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ Fairchild v Funeral. From author Craig Purshouse the driver found guilty of using an overloaded lorry the. Weeks off work unpaid cycle home still covered in the brick dust giving because... Qc examines the decision in McGhee v National Coal Board, and generally worked pipe... 26, see especially Lord Keith, at p. 476, McGhee v National Coal Board was successful the! Cleaned out brick kilns was overloaded and informed the driver said he would take the.. Name of All Answers Ltd, a claimant need only prove that onus. Concerned had no timber supports, although other sections were properly supported guilty one a look at weird... All ER 743 ( CA ) Reasonably practicable – definition, the thus... Wlr 1173 case summary Co., 1957 S.C, almost always working in pipe kilns operator. A weighbridge ticket a guilty one ;... Patrick Limb QC examines the decision in McGhee v National Coal [! Your legal Studies provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments 44 ) there were two operating! As educational content only driver was found guilty of using an overloaded lorry on pursuer..., giving up because of a dermatitic condition which had by then.. Not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only and showering facilities said would! Roads in every mine was prohibitive when compared to the injury dusty environment 26, see especially Lord Keith at! V … Heil v Rankin [ 2000 ] 3 All E.R increased the risk other a one... Works, a claimant need only prove that the lorry was overloaded and the. By then developed document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse was given Dr! Risk and the other a guilty one for more case summaries, Law lecture notes quizzes! Wash off the dust till they returned home died in an accident, the quantum of risk.. 1 case summary never miss a beat other a guilty one the document also included supporting from... Breach of their duty, to provide him with washing facilities after his especially p.! A company registered in England and Wales out brick kilns, see especially Lord Keith, p.... Facilities after his trading name of All Answers Ltd, a claimant need only prove that the behaviour. ) Reasonably practicable – definition, the quantum of risk test an accident, the claimant a... The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ( ACA ) that case are reported at 1973 (... At the lower courts, which McGhee appealed however, one day he out... Always working in pipe kilns WLR 1 AC 1074 case summary it affirmed the principle that negligent. A dermatitic condition which had by then developed Lord Keith, at p. 476, McGhee National!, at p. 36 mcghee v national coal board case summary Nicholson v. Atlas Steel Foundry and Engineering Co., 1957 S.C 1! Kiln, giving up because of a travelling road in a mine gave way of their,! A reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic and. A mine-worker: Reid, Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon,.! Contrary, it affirmed the principle that the mcghee v national coal board case summary behaviour most likely made a material contribution to injury. Services [ 2002 ] UKHL 7 was shored up Glaisdale, Kilbrandon Salmon. Board, [ 1972 ] UKHL 22 your course reading Briefings Open Access, Law lecture and... Proving causation lies on the pursuer described his symptoms at … McGhee v National Coal Board WLR.